-burns oxygen with gaseous fuel
-one plant in Europe
potential problems: release of methane, which is worse than carbon dioxide
-takes a lot of energy, might not be worth it or seen as efficient
-having this one plant in Europe may cause people to investigate this process further and possibly make the process more efficient
Justice says EPA has Power
-Clean Air Act, 1960s
-major steps in the sense that politics is becoming more concerned with environmental policies
Clean Coal Plant canceled-Hydrogen Economy, Too
-FutureGen
-(refer to our article on China and coal. This is the failed American version)
-still not economically feasible
-argued that its not feasible by Jeff Goodell, in "Big Coal: The dirty secret behind America's energy future".
-plant fell through because of major costs
-possibly trying to use this process on a much smaller scale
-some argue that it needs to be done even though it may not be successful/efficient...argue that we need to start somewhere and that no process is typically successful in its first run. You never really know until you try-kind of mindset
-lack of government funding
1 comment:
OK
Post a Comment